Non-video link from Canadian-owned source

  • joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It doesn’t matter what carney was the president off. You said that Brookfield would be the owner of these houses, and based of the evidence we have and you provided, there is zero proof that that’s the case.

    There is nothing else really to discuss. You made something up and stared it as fact, and you acknowledge that it’s at best a guess based off weak connections.

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Since you are so versed in figure of phrases you should be able to understand a hyperbole. But evidently that’s too complex for you, I’m sorry I’ll dumb it down next time.

      • joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        When did lies become hyperbole?

        You said something untrue and then tried to continue to justify it as if it were true. If you were indeed trying to make a joke by exaggerating that should have been your initial response to my question, but instead you run into it.

        You don’t have to dumb anything down, if anything you need to step it up a notch if you’re trying to pass off lies as truth 😛

        Edit: if you’re curious, what you did isn’t hyperbole at all. Hyperbole would be suggesting that Brookfield will own all the rental properties, or something along those lines.

        Trying to state that the government is planning to work with Brookfield to do this program isn’t hyperbole unless there is a grain of truth to exaggerate, which there isn’t. You can’t exaggerate a lie and turn it into hyperbole.