• PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Hot take: I hate when software just extracts an executable.
    Fucking install it so that it’s registered with the software updater and uninstaller. Don’t make me remember that I have to go hunting in the folder to delete this one app.

  • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’d like to make it like that for my projects, but I don’t use windows so I can’t do well with packaging them. And sometimes when I try it runs in the computer, but then doesn’t run in other computers because of missing dlls or some other things.

    Anyone have good idea how to make it easy. Using windows VM is such a hassle to install and such just for tiny programs I make.

    • hangonasecond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Make them in a portable language. Something like Java for example. Or you can write in rust and compile for each target.

      • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        It’s in rust. Problem is the gtk part, it has to be installed in the system, which makes it run there. But how do I distribute the program without having everyone install gtk on their computer. In Linux it’s just a dependency so it’s not a problem, for windows I can’t seem to make it work.

        Edit: also, I need gtk because people around me who uses windows aren’t going to use CLI program at all.

        • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Oof GTK is probably one of the worst dependencies you can try and port to Windows.

          What I’ve done in the past is use something like Onno Setup which can call a script during install.

          Or, and this is new to me, use the Official tools to build a package for windows on whatever Linux distro you are on. From what I’m reading, it should package GTK with it.

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Running Linux on closed source hardware. Classic.

      I bet you aren’t even using your own open RISC-V based SBC, with fully open-source peripherals. Is your computer monitor even running an open-source firmware or are you just a FOSS poser?

      • herrvogel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 hours ago

        No. You either go full Stallman and inject Gentoo directly into your aorta, or you might as well be deep throating Satya Nutella while bouncing on Tim Apple’s lap. Filthy casual.

        • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Noob, I snort pure Colombian and run LFS directly in my brain using the power of cryptic dreams and messages handed down to me directly by Lord RMS

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            So you’re saying your prefrontal cortex doesn’t even have a Holy C✝ compiler? Terry looks down on you in shame.

      • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Agreed, OSS purity is silly. I am running an open source client (Thunder) to this open source service on my Pixel 9 running GraphineOS, the low level firmware is still absolutely proprietary.

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Actually, to be clear, I don’t think FOSS purity is bad. I just mean that denigrating what others are doing because they’re using something non-free while they’re making steps in the right direction is dumb and counterproductive.

          To my mind, FOSS is the only way forward for a healthy, functioning society, and the fact that so much of our digital landscape is being gradually replaced with it is to me evidence of that. I think the end goal should always be pure FOSS, but that doesn’t (necessarily) mean immediately jumping to all FOSS; it just means taking steps to cut out proprietary software wherever you reasonably can.

  • Shipairtime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I just got blender after having last looked at it ten years ago. It looks so much better! I had an easy time finding stuff. If you tried it in the past and are afraid of how ugly it was it is worth another shot. Also look up the doughnut tutorial.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Exactly! And every proprietary software is by definition perfect cause it is subject to the forces of the open market. Subway eat fresh and freeze, scumbag!

    • melfie@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      It’s a jack of all trades for sure, but it also has features paid software doesn’t, like it’s 2d animation system with Grease Pencil. There are also paid extensions on BlenderMarket and the like that make it more competitive with more specialized features in other software. Extensions are GPL licensed, so I’m happy to pay for them as opposed to the rest of the toxic CG ecosystem where everything is subscription-only.

      Edit:

      I wish all paid software were GPL. It’s nice buying something and being able to look at and change the code, write code that calls their code, or even snag a bit of it for to use in your own thing.

    • Matriks404@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If you don’t count professional software, nowadays it’s actually the opposite. Very often in proprietary software there are features removed with no alternative provided by developers, or there’s one but actually it has nothing to do with what you actually want.

  • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    On a somewhat related note, why do so many open source projects give me a zip file with a single exe inside it instead of just the exe directly?

      • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Plus a lot of antivirus whatevers will straight up block the downloading of *.exe

        • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          A lot of exe files are secretly zip files. zip files can contain arbitrary data at the end of the file. exe files can have arbitrary data at the start of the file. It’s a match made at Microsoft.