data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef118/ef118db8538316d13414b77917e324f00e093d44" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d29d/2d29d8b719847a2865697d4c989e15b265dca283" alt=""
As a PhD student you’d be surprised at how many stupid people are in here. I’ve heard of people talking about using holy water in mouse before experimenting because they are “possessed by devil”, people talking about how “I’m a liberal but female president isn’t going to be strong enough for our country” to their female colleagues, talked with people who told " they[gay people] should just get help" to a gay colleague because her bible says being gay is a sin, those are just extra fun examples, there’s a lot more in daily life that after joining PhD I’ve become a lot skeptic of any research or paper people cite for something. Because lot’s of people just write sentences first then search for papers that agrees, instead of doing actual literature review and learning about diverse view on the matter.
Extra note on this. NWS’s agenda also includes educating people about weather and climate and other things. Our engineering class about rainfall and such basically is in chaos right now because the person from NWS teaching it is no longer working there. So this will have long impact for future generations. Specifically since our engineering department already is very tiny compared to other departments.