• TJA!@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    This will never be removed. There will only ever going to be more types of websites that have to use this

    • JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I wonder if that’ll end up being true. I’d guess these constituents represent voters that watch porn at least as much on average as anyone else. I’m going to go ahead and guess above average. They might get tired of this and push for change. But I’m also admittedly less educated on how our political system works than I should be and might be overestimating how much influence Florida Man has because he’s disgruntled at having to jump through hurdles to fap.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The problem is that it’s political suicide to be the “pro sex, pro smut” politician. Consistently the counters to anti sexual freedom laws have come from the courts. By saying “age verification on porn has gone too far,” a politician more or less accepts that their entire campaign is going to be about this. And when that happens the right has the advantage because they have the ability to be short and quippy as they misrepresent you and play to emotions.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, and its why we never repealed the Comstock laws. Its also why unconstitutional laws should be automatically stricken from the books, not merely deemed unenforcable