Yacht money for the rich. They need it more than the old and disabled

That sounds like they might have an insecure attachment style.

Based responses from you tbh. Relationships work best when you try to solve problems rather than ramp up emotions constantly

Maybe he means the pirate barbarossa?

The worst part is its the most offensive kind of ugly: the kind where it could’ve not been, but also very ugly.

I love the idea of a trim package of trucks specially designed for strippers and that it’s the opposite of a pimpmobile. Now I’m just picturing a bunch of sex workers driving banged up barebones kei trucks

Or the Chrysler brothers

Ooh bad news about the NTSA

Idk i think it might, but the problem is the Honda 0 series looks like it’s about to do what the cyber truck clearly was going for aesthetically, but like, good looking.

If it winds up an early, ugly, and politically controversial interpretation on a style that winds up being picked up its not likely to hold the DeLorean position.

The right doesn’t want an ev and the left doesn’t want a car sold by a nazi. The cybertruck doesn’t have mass market appeal as a result. Sure the technofascists love them but you shouldn’t mass produce something when your target customer is Caroline Ellison of all people

This is a question that’s great at getting theological arguments going. So to start with, we’re going to be ignoring religions and cultures not dominated by abrahamic religions because Hinduism split from mesopotamian religions in a very different way than Judaism and religions not associated with or influenced by the the mesopotamian civilization start are wildly different and I don’t know shit about them.

So, archeologically, evidence points to the Abrahamic God forming out of two or so male gods from mesopotamia and what began as a group devoting to that god eventually developed into a monotheistic religion. It looks like this may have been a storm god in competition with Baal, but as his religion developed he became androgynous but maintained he/him pronouns.

Theologically: hoo fucking boy that’s a fight right there. Neopagans and Mormons are in agreement that it’s because he’s a manifestation of the divine masculine and that there exists a divine feminine counterpart. Catholics (and to my knowledge jews though I’ve met some who agree with the neopagans and mormons) say that it’s tradition to address him in the masculine but he’s genderless. Some protestants will argue that he’s male and that men were created in his image and women less so. Other protestants agree with the Catholics. Others will say that the holy spirit is the divine feminine. And I’m sure many other interpretations exist.

Yeah, and its why we never repealed the Comstock laws. Its also why unconstitutional laws should be automatically stricken from the books, not merely deemed unenforcable

“Broken homes or parentless” is a bonkers grouping. A broken home means a parent is there. Parentless can mean anything from what is clearly intended to be implied to “living with loving next of kin”

Ukraine is going to renuclearize

I didn’t expect Michigan on the list

Rule 1: be attractive Rule 2: don’t be unattractive

And yeah, developing confidence did wonders

Rule 1: be attractive Rule 2: don’t be unattractive

Yeah they’re trying to label trans existence as inherently sexual so that they can call us pedos for existing near children

It’s how you remove minorities from positions where they can resist you.

That’s fair. And the fact that I was following rules 1&2 probably explains the rest, because wow you would not believe how blatantly people can hit on you without you noticing when you hate your appearance