• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I agree, and personally find “chaste” or “prude” women unattractive.

    I find it very fascinating and difficult to relate to that large swaths of the population seem to see it differently. The number of times i’ve heard some man say “women should all be more modest” is mind-blowing for me.

    Women, as all humans, have value within themselves, and if they manage to express that (“self-expression”) then the outer world gets to see and share a part of that value. If people don’t act on their instincts, they might as well be dead. Non-constructivists “traditionalists” are only dead weight and don’t contribute anything to society, and i don’t comprehend how some people can see meaning outside of the expressions of the living’s soul. That is why self-expression is so important.

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yup. Whenever I encounter excessive chastity, I think “what else is she repressing? What happens if that repression breaks - or never breaks?” It feels fake and uncomfortable. Not an attractive feeling.

      TBF, maybe she’s just being totally reasonable but picky, but that doesn’t have the same emotional vibe.

    • SitD@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      in a framework where people are just alive to mate this is a valid theory, but women can also self-express in more ways than offering sex 😂 also, people who only act on their instincts are even more dead than the ones that never act on their instincts. whenever your mode of operation is exactly and only one, never changing, that’s not a good thing.

      anyways, i agree with the core here, which is that vast amounts of the population heavily communicate what criteria others have to fulfill to be desirable. I’d much rather prefer everyone does what they want and chill out

    • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      If people don’t act on their instincts, they might as well be dead.

      Psychopaths: “Oh boy, here I go killing again.”

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    If 100+ is the standard, “giga” is way too high. I’m thinking more along the lines of “century seductress”.

    Also, that was such a powerful burn I can feel the warmth from here.

    • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not even a megaslut or a kiloslut. I wonder if a gigaslut is physically possible?

      Imagine one partner every ten seconds, during a 40h workweek, 52 weeks a year…

      That’s just 748,800 partners a year. Let’s call it an even 750,000. That’s a year and 4 months of professional fucking just to become a megaslut.

      Even for someone dedicating themselves to the job 60h a week during their whole life (60 years), would still be just 67 times a megaslut, only 6.7% of the way to become a gigaslut.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        See, a true slut isn’t limited to one partner at a time though, assuming a conventional functional set of anus, vagina, and mouth. If you also allow hands to count for slutification, then you could have as many as five at once.

        So, you could triple your numbers and get there in a reasonable period of time