!conservative@lemmy.world because there is no clickable link here.

Proper open source, GPLv3

So its just a standard rasterization gpu with some extra AI label slapped on it then?

No. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_processing_unit

That is some acrobatic gatekeeping of a GPU that is similar to the PS5 in terms of performance.

The top model should be far more powerful than a PS5.

Point is, we have had comparable systems for years that you can buy for less money, and are actually repairable and upgradable.

Actually, it’s not a point to the part I’ve replied to. The statement was solely that this APU-using PC must not be called a gaming device and I’ve pointed out the flaw in that claim. I did not make a comment regarding upgadability.

If integrated graphics counts as a “gaming PC” then every PC and laptop made in the past 15 years, including Chromebooks count as a “Gaming PC”.

Yeah, why would an iGPU so beefy, it’s in the same league as a GeForce 4060 be called a gaming GPU? OUTRAGEOUS!

Also, Unexposedhazard used the term “gaming device”.

It only has an APU

Like every somewhat modern game console.

and some AI core bullshit.

Yeah, why would frame generation have anything to do with gaming…

Edit: typo