data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef118/ef118db8538316d13414b77917e324f00e093d44" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2f93/f2f939022ffae29e4decb326a98f4493d0a2e13e" alt=""
How could you tell anything by their profiles? Most had no content or other information. It’s not like Reddit where you can view their comments.
How could you tell anything by their profiles? Most had no content or other information. It’s not like Reddit where you can view their comments.
Jeez, no kidding.
5 year minimum for vandalism? Feds stepping in because she used a Molotov cocktail to cause minor damage? Wrists and ankles shackled like she’s a danger to the people around her?
Meanwhile the insurrectionists walk free and people who cause millions in harm just write a check.
Therein lies the larger indictment of the philosophy. It’s only fine when you’re not doing anything important. If your website is important, it’s also not fine to break it.
Workman’s comp isn’t just covering hospital bills, it also covers lost wages while recovering or retaining if you can’t go back to your old profession.
Let’s do racism and sexism, not because we’re racist and sexist, but because other people probably are. It may look like us and the bigots of unclear numbers are both having the same effect, but we’re not bad people just because our actions proactively support bad things. We’re just being pragmatic.
I only saw one that had videos and one that had a playlist of some videos of a rightwing influencer. I wouldn’t take account age to be a sign of not-bot, both because of compromised accounts as you mentioned and because YouTube botting has been going on for a long time now. It’s 20 years old at this point and video monetization was introduced pretty soon after creation.
Here’s their anti-bot policy page from 2014: https://web.archive.org/web/20140209083324/https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/3399767?hl=en