Considering the proliferation of AI-generated slop, as well as the lines between satire and reality being blurred, I wonder if future historians will have a harder time understanding what was really going on.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    My oh my. Check out Mr. Optimist over here thinking that they’ll be time to be “historians” in between scavenging for scraps and battling the nuclear mutants for the last bottle of fresh water at the bombed out Tesco.

    • Aphelion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Well la-dee-dah! Look at Mr. “I think humans will still exist in 1000 years” over here. Let’s be real, we’re on track to extinct ourselves in the next 200 years if we don’t make some very difficult and dramatic changes to our behavior.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 hours ago

    A “dark age” is really just one where records didn’t survive, not that it was particularly bad. This usually follows a breakdown of power structures but the real loss is that we can’t know what happened.

    I’m worried that transitioning so much to fragile digital technology could result in massive amounts of knowledge and culture being inaccessible, like that guy’s hard drive full of Bitcoin.

    And it’s not just all of society that will be lost, but family history as well. Photographs and letters survive a long, long time. But without strict preservation and keeping old formats alive my grandkids won’t be able to flip through old photos of my family like I can with an old photo album.

  • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Some kind of dark ages - yes.

    I suspect it will be considered the Lunatic Age or the Misinformation Age or the Willfully Ignorant Age or something like that, since its most distinctive characteristic, in retrospect, is likely to be the oddity that the creation of the most efficient and comprehensive information-sharing system the world has yet seen led pretty much directly to a worldwide epidemic of ignorance, stupidity, irrationality, and insanity.

    • illi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’ve seen “post factual” thrown around the most

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Post modernism way of thinking is inherently subjetivist and in that world every is right if you approach situation from their perspective…

        That’s where we be now. Really makes it easier for somebody to rule us it seems.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If the dark ages were so called due to the shortage of sources, ours will be called the glare-blind age in contrast.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah this is exactly what they want. No Voice, Free Exit sounds a lot like no representation and slavery to me.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Depends if you mean dark ages by not a lot of information that survives or economic stagnation.

    First one idk but we are fully in an economic stagnation period due to late stage capitalism impeding innovation.

    So historians might think that not much happened as in not much that is worth remembering happened.