We don’t operate under a framework where everything needs to be 100% defined, else prosecuting/legislating would become unreasonably cumbersome to the point where it’d be so easy to find loopholes.

Whatever a jury of your peers determines is reasonable to define as hate speech, under guidance of the law. Here’s an example: https://www.ag.gov.au/national-security/publications/displaying-prohibited-symbols-offences

You’re trying so hard to justify that all speech should be tolerated, but it should not.

Look what they’re getting the the US, barely hidden Nazis in positions of power.

Fuck that.