• Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Spending significant resources to prevent it is exactly what encryption is. What the government wants is to completely eliminate online private communication. Continuing with the analogy: you want telescreens.

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Huh? I don’t think you understand my comment. Except for the last line, you’re just further agreeing with me and I’m already agreeing with you.

            • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Telling someone who says government access will be used to spy on citizens but will be useless for combating serious crime that they want telescreens, a fictitious device used for government spying, doesn’t make any sense. Either you don’t know what a telescreen is, you have poor reading comprehension, or you’re a fairly clever troll. Maybe some of all the above.

              • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I’m telling someone who says that a want for uncompromising privacy is a US thing that it’s not, and that these compromises they speak of would be akin to telescreens if applied to a non-digital situation.

                • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  I’m telling someone who says that a want for uncompromising privacy is a US thing that it’s not

                  But their comment doesn’t say or suggest that.

                  and that these compromises they speak of would be akin to telescreens if applied to a non-digital situation.

                  And they don’t say anything about the compromises except that they’d be used for spying on citizenry.

                  This isn’t my fight, I saw you were confused and thought I’d help. My mistake, you really are one of those double down or die types.