I haven’t played since before Wizards started pushing Commander, at that time called EDH. I felt the Standard Format was a perfect setup to keep the game fresh and innovative while still making money, and the Legacy Format was perfect for the people who had cards that are no longer in Standard. I think the Commander Format killed a perfect system, and Wizards/Hasbro are just trying everything to make money and keep the game mostly unplayable with the licensed tie-ins.

  • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Come play Flesh and Blood! It’s like if Magic the Gathering was thematically representing Mortal Kombat gameplay.
    And Genesis: Battle of Champions! It’s like if Magic the Gathering was crossed with Final Fantasy Tactics.
    And Magi Nation! It’s like if the entire Pokémon franchise aged up with its demographic, was more well-written and designed, and was just overall better than Pokémon at everything except for competing with the actual Pokémon franchise. They’re back after a successful Kickstarter!

  • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    EDH was a community-developed format before wizards adopted and renamed it.

    It’s a fun, casual format. There is a lot about modern MTG releases that suck but blaming a casual, community-driven format is a wack take.

    • psion1369@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You are right that I shouldn’t blame the format. I will blame Wizards for pushing it so hard it’s pretty much the only way to play the game right now.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    WotC has been royally fucking up Standard for the past few years, but I don’t think that Commander is the problem.

    The problem is that WotC wants to push more product, which is messing with how Standard works. They should just accept that there are four standard sets a year, choose the most thematic Universes Beyond set to be a part of Standard magic, and accept that some Universes Beyond product shouldn’t be in Standard Magic.

  • Joeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It’s also the sheer amount… They are getting new sets every two months… On top of things like secret lairs and everything… It’s just to much…

  • Redacted@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Never been a fan of CCGs as their business models are exploitative and inevitably lead to power creep.

    Netrunner and Compile have me sorted for card games for a while.

  • Pronell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I’m 50. I was playing M:tG back in high school. Revised was the unlimited set out at the time. I thought they were overdoing the expansions back then.

    Now it all seems remarkably silly to me with all the licensed stuff, and I’m glad I gave it up 30 years ago.

    It was fun at the time but now it’s too exhausting to keep up with.

  • BigDiction@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Limited has gotten pretty great as more complexity has been forced into common and uncommon slots.

    I do not enjoy the tracking mechanics like Ring Tempts, Dungeons, Speed, and fucking holy shit day/night.

  • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Commander is by far the most popular format for many good reasons.

    I however am not a fan of some recent sets design wise. Bloomburrow was peak though, and felt like a return to a more classic mtg experience.

    Personally I’m a fan of budget commander, where it’s still commander with these 3 deck building rules:

    1. Your total deck price l, if you price it online, cannot exceed $70 USD

    2. You cannot play any cards that have ever been banned in any mainstream constructive format (discluding rarity based formats like pauper)

    3. Proxies are not allowed, as it goes against the spirit of this format

    The core spirit is “stop feeling compelled to proxy shit, support your LGS!”

    • Æther@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I feel like you’re implying that proxying and supporting your LGS is mutually exclusive, which I would argue is categorically untrue.

      • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The entire point of the format is to actively make it so you are no longer pressured to proxy cuz you need thousands of dollars in cards to function at the table.

        This is with the intent to make players want to actually go to their lgs and buy actual real cards, instead of ordering proxies from random companies in China.

        Trying to pretend that players feeling compelled to proxy their deck isn’t inherently unhealthy for the local game ecosystem is silly.

        The #1 thing LGSs want is bodies in the door. So if players are getting back into stores to buy a bunch of 50 cent cards, they probably are also supporting the LGS in other ways inherently.

        The current casual meta of 5 people sitting down and all of them pulling out proxied decks directly means 5 less instances of people actively walking into their LGS to shop.

        You can say what you want but as someone friends with LGS owners, I can definitely say the chilling effect of proxying on the casual economy has been very noticeable. The market for casual cards has heavily dried up.

        Tonnes of people take the next step of “well if I am proxying 10 cards why not proxy all 100 who cares”

        Shops demand for cheap staples dries up.

        Shops stop buying cheap staples bulk cuz they arent selling.

        Non proxy’ing players can’t find their cards that need… so they guve up and turn to proxying too

        You can see how that feedback loop is unhealthy, right? Thus here I am, promoting a format that aims to counter this feedback loop and try and inject health back into the local casual tabletop ecosystem

        So yeah, if you proxy in the aforementioned format, you are not playing in the “spirit” of it.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Commander has always been my least favorite way to play. I have no comment on anything else because I lost interest completely when they started pushing it. But I will say, every time I hear news about it I’m glad that I stopped dumping money into that cash cow of a card game. And from a business standpoint, I feel they’ve shot themselves in the foot. The reason why Pokemon cards are still so widely sought after is because, for the most part, things have stayed the same (And collectors, of course). With MTG there’s basically no point in owning any cards before 2016 since they’re all underpowered or illegal in any formal setting. Besides hardcore collectors, they’re basically just cardboard.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’d say power creep in Pokemon might even be worse than in Magic. Looking at old cards vs new cards makes it painfully obvious.

      • TommySoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I think that’s just a side effect of making new editions for any TCG. If you don’t provide an incentive to get the new hotness no one will buy it.

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Psh I love playing commander. Me and 3 buddies just getting hammered and shit talking for 6 hours is great fun. I’m not a super magic purist though. I can see how if you’re into other formats the pandering to commander players would be annoying. But I’m the one being pandered to so I’m fine with it.

    • scutiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Agreed. They sort of made sense as an experiment in Lorwyn, but planeswalkers became the face of the game and had to be shoehorned into every set since then. They’re bad game design as all the rules and strategy need to be adjusted just to make them work, and they still take over games on their own.

      The real shark jump was when they made a set with dozens of planeswalkers in it. Way to take your worst-designed cards and just shove a set full of them.

      • Hello_there@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The idea for planewalkers is just crazy.

        • new requirement to split combat damage between player and a new card type
        • hard to kill: can’t use kill/burn cards, unless they’re new, special kill/burn cards that you have to add to deck.
        • multiple gameplay effect options on each card
        • these are special characters, so they tend toward game-breaking effects.
        • escalating threats - gotta kill it by time the last option is available or game is over.

        Its like its designed to be annoying, in your face, and fundamentally change how every game is played.

        • scutiger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Originally, they were treated as players. A damage spell that could hit a player could be redirected on resolution to damage their planeswalker instead. This led to some pretty dumb situations when rather than declare a spell targeting the planeswalker, you would declare it targeting the player, essentially tricking them into thinking the planeswalker was safe and allowing a spell to resolve, only to redirect the damage after the spell is allowed.

          Creatures having to be declared attacking a planeswalker specifically made the game tedious as well.

          The fact that you have a game-breaking permanent on the board that you have to turn your attention to immediately even if you’re way ahead in the game, it just feels worse than stabilizing the board and turning the tide. And then they have to keep making new, more powerful ones to get people to buy new product.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I haven’t played since before Wizards started pushing Commander, at that time called EDH.

    So you haven’t played in two decades. Hard to take your opinion seriously. You can play for free with their app now.

    • psion1369@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I visit many of the game shops in my area to try to find TTRPG’s and players, but all I find is Magic players and they will talk about the game in length.

    • Æther@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Its so funny to see opinion posts that start with “I haven’t actually consumed this product yet/since the update that I have an opinion about”

  • Dirac@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    My unpopular opinion is I don’t mind the tie ins (mostly). I remember being a kid and wanting all my favorite characters to have cards, so I’d feel bad yucking someone else’s yum just because I don’t care for a particular franchise. That being said I’m also a bit confused, op. Standards still exists. This feels like you’re saying “I don’t like Super Mario Advanced 3, because Mario Bros isn’t as good a game as Super Mario Bros 3.” Though if you said any of the following I’d agree: Wizards focuses too much on commander; changing standard rotation rules wasn’t the best idea; the last few standard sets have had somewhat ridiculous themes; using standard design space to print cards targeting commander players might muddy the standard card pool.

    • psion1369@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I get what you are saying about what I said with Standard. It is that Wizards focuses too much on Commander, and some of these tie-in could have awesome CCG on their own, like Fallout. I think Fallout could stand to have an awesome CCG that would sell pretty amazingly. Regarding Standard, yes the format still exists, but the way sets are released it feels like it’s only there for the old players like me.

  • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I like to play Commander… in a sense that I have a deck dedicated to larger games where I’m happy to mostly mash shit together in an oversized deck and only have one copy of each card. I have plenty of fun in games where nobody knows what I’m about to do, including me!

    3+ player games would make Arena more fun as well.