What products are most at risk. What are easiest to replace to reduce risk? Hardest to replace?

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Our infrastructure. All our core network switches which are all American companies. Could you imagine if they did this the response around the world.

  • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    GPS. The system can be turned off in specific regions (no idea how, it’s classified, but they’ve actually done it so it’s not just a wild notion), and portions of the signal are already encrypted such that they’re only available to the US military. There would be little stopping them from sending altered signals or just turning it off.

    Many missile systems, aircraft and fighting vehicles rely on GPS to function as expected.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The cell phone network might be a day 0 target, but Cell phones would be left mostly untouched, they are easy to track/drone strike. Interference would only happen acutely for IED concerns or cqb operations

    GPS/Satellite location would be jammed / disabled

    Internet connections would be targeted, sea cables, microwave, etc

    Electrical systems would be targeted.

    Prioritize:

    • electrical backups
    • clean water backups
    • communication backups (point to point fiber, lasers, microwave)
    • Troy@lemmy.caOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      cell phone network

      Oddly enough, there was a huge push a while back to prevent Huawei being used in the cell phone network as infrastructure, because it gave China a potential espionage route. No one was thinking “kill switch” during this discussion. And no one was considering US tech in this discussion as a risk either.

      I wonder what percentage of Canadian cell phone infrastructure is American?