Summary

Twenty-one staffers from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) resigned, citing ethical concerns over dismantling public services and compromising sensitive data.

Formerly part of the U.S. Digital Service, they criticized Musk and Trump’s overhaul, which included layoffs and politically charged interviews.

Their letter warned that removing skilled technologists endangers essential services like Social Security and veterans’ benefits.

The resignations add to growing concerns over Musk’s aggressive federal cuts, amplified by his recent CPAC speech where he symbolically wielded a chainsaw against “bureaucracy.”

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I was watching an interesting video by an ex-Tesla employee who basically confirmed what we all know - Musk is operationally incompetent and loves to showboat, firing people regardless of their value to the system, piling stress and additional work onto others. And does it even when there are process improvements that would yielded the same savings (or increase profits) and preserve jobs. That’s literally his own mode of operation - work people harder with the threat of firings.

    And now he does the same BS with the federal government. People will die because of this.

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I would love to see posts like this end up on right leaning spaces like critical posts about left leaning issues end up on left leaning spaces.

    Trumps base has such a sycophant army that they just swarm spaces and post this stuff every minute of every day. But the opposite doesn’t happen. Having even 100 people posting stuff like this across their space would do more than a 10 000 person protest ever could but it amazes me that 10 000 would take time off work, go stand in the rain for a week instead of shit posting effectively.

  • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I am always confused why they don’t just sabotage the efforts? Like it would be so easy and they definitely aren’t paying attention…

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Different people are able to take on different levels of risk.

      Just because these people resigned doesn’t mean that some other people aren’t staying in for the purposes of being subversive, and you shouldn’t ever hear about the latter.

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s the thing, though. They’re not really taking risks.

        Much of what DOGE does is completely illegal and does not go through the proper channels and processes. By simply doing their jobs and forcing everything through the proper processes, they can slow down everything, maybe even to a halt, while being completely in the right and thus can’t be fired.

        Yes, it takes a mental toll, but these guys have a responsibility.

        • Artyom@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          They’re unemployed government workers, there are less government jobs now than ever, and their resume literally says DOGE on it. They are taking a risk.

          • leisesprecher@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            No. They resigned from a job. They were not fired. And as long as they don’t break any rules, it’s hard to fire them.

            • Artyom@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              I never said they were fired, but since you brought it up, when you’re fired, you’ll usually get a severance to help during the job search, they won’t, they’re just unemployed.

              • leisesprecher@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                … because they resigned. Seriously, what’s your point?

                If they wouldn’t have resigned, they would still have a job. And since they couldn’t have been fired easily, they would have continued to have a job for quite a while.

                That’s not a complex concept, what’s so hard to understand about that?

                • Artyom@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  They resigned from a job they believed was wrong, which will lead to substantial financial consequences for them. You tried to dismiss their efforts as if it was nothing, so I called you out for being dismissive. You say “Seriously, what’s your point?” As if I’m the one making provocative statements from the sidelines.