A few streets here re-introduced street parking explicitly as a traffic calming measure (in addition to a separate bike lane behind the parked cars).
I know it works. I can tell it works. But I still don’t really like it.
A few streets here re-introduced street parking explicitly as a traffic calming measure (in addition to a separate bike lane behind the parked cars).
I know it works. I can tell it works. But I still don’t really like it.
If people were respectful of people with impairments and their needs, instead of hijacking the terminology for playground insults, there would be no treadmill.
Everyone is temporarily abled, at best.
The issue is not whether their needs are special or exceptional. It’s that there are needs that need to be met.
If you are not either rich or in possession of a working pancreas, that means you have displeased god.
There’s pretty solid research about these things from the past 30 years or so. At this point, ignoring literature is just rank anti-intellectualism.
Good luck, sounds like you’re going to need it.
Ah yes. Riding American exceptionalism all the way down.
Wait, how do “bike lanes worsen traffic congestion”?
I’m sorry, can someone explain this to me?
Scary woke branch name triggered you? Need to get back to your safe space?
This is obviously crazy talk, but so is keeping feature branches alive over extended periods of time. Depending on the development tempo of your project and the number of people involved, you should figure out a way to land things into main (in pieces if needed) within a few days.
It’s worse: they are banking on fusion and SMR, which are pipe dreams even at twice the time scale:
I hope they are lying knowing they are lying.