Your instance has a height restriction on it, but accessing it from another instance or from an app that fetches the original should work: https://discuss.online/post/23443364

In a similar spirit, the Juicy Lucy was invented in MN, though two different bars claim to be the ones that invented it.

A Jucy Lucy (or Juicy Lucy) is a stuffed cheeseburger with the cheese inside of the meat instead of on top, resulting in a melted core of cheese. It is a popular, regional cuisine in Minnesota, particularly in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul. Two bars in Minneapolis claim to have invented the burger, while other local bars and restaurants have created their own interpretations of the style.

What makes it special? Is there a particular dish/sauce that’s made with it that you like?

I saw a comment elsewhere that found a way to make the hallucinations useful:

I’ve found this to be one of the most useful ways to use (at least) GPT-4 for programming. Instead of telling it how an API works, I make it guess, maybe starting with some example code to which a feature needs to be added. Sometimes it comes up with a better approach than I had thought of. Then I change the API so that its code works.

Conversely, I sometimes present it with some existing code and ask it what it does. If it gets it wrong, that’s a good sign my API is confusing, and how.

That looks like the perfect hangover food lol

I’ve had similar food before, but never exactly that, looks good! The history is interesting, being invented for coal miners is a very WV.

The metaphor of “stochastic parrots” has become a rallying cry for those who seek to preserve the sanctity of human cognition against the encroachment of large language models. In this paper, we extend this metaphor to its logical conclusion: if language models are stochastic parrots, and humans learned language through statistical exposure to linguistic data, then humans too must be stochastic parrots. Through careful argumentation, we demonstrate why this is impossible—humans possess the mystical quality of “true understanding” while machines possess only “pseudo-understanding.” We introduce the Recursive Parrot Paradox (RPP), which states that any entity capable of recognizing stochastic parrots cannot itself be a stochastic parrot, unless it is, in which case it isn’t. Our analysis reveals that emergent abilities in language models are merely “pseudo-emergent,” unlike human abilities which are “authentically emergent” due to our possession of what we term “ontological privilege.” We conclude that no matter how persuasive, creative, or capable language models become, they remain sophisticated pattern matchers, while humans remain sophisticated pattern matchers with souls

The paper is tongue-in-cheek, but gets to an important point. Anyone saying “But LLMs are just …” has to explain why that “…” doesn’t also apply to humans. IMO a lot of people throwing around “stochastic parrots!” just want humans to be special, and work backwards from there.

It’s easy to harrumph at this article if you hate AI and all that, but I think it’s interesting to try to come up with a somewhat objective definition of creativity. I do think it gets at an important part of the creative process, “Necessity is the mother of all invention”. When you’re working locally and stuff starts getting weird because of nonlocal constraints, then you have to start getting creative to make it all work coherently as best you can.

lemm.ee going down is a huge loss for Lemmy, but welcome! Hopefully we’ll be a good replacment for it

I hope your weekend is girthy too 😄

Welcome! Thanks for introducing yourself, and sorry about all the stuff going on south of the border here in the US 🫠 I’m hoping for this movement to take off

The surprise is spoiled => the surprise is a cake => the cake is spoiled. It’s a pun on the meaning of “spoiled”

Great reaction from the first one. Granny gonna get herself some

It’s got the right rhythm

Yeah, my cat almost died from getting into chocolate he shouldn’t have been able to, but he’s very food-motivated and smart when it comes to accessing food. The vet said cat toxicity models for chocolate are mostly borrowed from the numbers for dogs, because cats are generally smart enough to not eat it. Not my cat though 🙀

They’re talking about the font that Truancy-bot’s dialogue is written in:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_(typeface)

Thanks, finally got around to reading it! Posted it over in !shortstories@literature.cafe:

https://discuss.online/post/19377951

This particular comic, or PBF comics in general?

Fun fact, this comic is where the term “weeb” comes from: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/weeaboo

I don’t remember where I saw it, but “weeaboo” is an intentionally nonsense word here, and it was picked because the author’s sister described a dream she had to him where people were shouting it. I saw a store called “weeb” the other day, and thought it was kind of funny that the store’s name derived from someone’s weird dream 20 years ago.

EDIT: Here’s the AMA where the author mentions the source: https://web.archive.org/web/20250413175535/https://old.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/2plhgn/iama_guy_who_does_the_perry_bible_fellowship_ama/cmxyxlz/

The correlation between the appropriation, the comic strip, and its true origin is sublimely meaningless. The word “Weeaboo” comes from a dream my sister had- in which a large room of Victorian-era people were shouting it at her, repeatedly.

Not really sure how that works with federation. You’re not “using” lemmy.world, you’re using lemm.ee, which has a copy of content from lemmy.world.