minus-squarectrl_alt_esc@lemmy.mlOPtoForgejo@programming.dev•code.forgejo.org vs codeberg.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·16 days agoThank you for the clarification! I indeed hadn’t seen that disclaimer. I’m aware of the other public instances, I was just wondering why codeberg itself would host multiple. The reason I started noticing this is because I saw projects like https://code.forgejo.org/renovate/renovate which seems to have migrated to https://codeberg.org/forgejo-contrib/forgejo-renovate, but the images are still only available on code.forgejo.org (or is it data.forgejo.org which is used for the image URLs in the repo?). I suppose if code.forgejo.org is for testing only, one also shouldn’t pull images from its registry. linkfedilink
ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml to Forgejo@programming.devEnglish · 16 days agocode.forgejo.org vs codeberg.orgplus-squaremessage-squaremessage-square2linkfedilinkarrow-up111arrow-down10
arrow-up111arrow-down1message-squarecode.forgejo.org vs codeberg.orgplus-squarectrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml to Forgejo@programming.devEnglish · 16 days agomessage-square2linkfedilink
Thank you for the clarification! I indeed hadn’t seen that disclaimer. I’m aware of the other public instances, I was just wondering why codeberg itself would host multiple.
The reason I started noticing this is because I saw projects like https://code.forgejo.org/renovate/renovate which seems to have migrated to https://codeberg.org/forgejo-contrib/forgejo-renovate, but the images are still only available on code.forgejo.org (or is it data.forgejo.org which is used for the image URLs in the repo?). I suppose if code.forgejo.org is for testing only, one also shouldn’t pull images from its registry.