Like one person uses them responsibly, like specifically for bathroom breaks, forces them at specific times so people don’t miss out on content.

Don’t worry they only put the eager ones in the videogames, you can ask.

They are losing money on their 200$ subscriber plan afaik. These “goalposts” are all saying the same thing.

It is a dead end because of the way it’s being driven.

You brought up 100 billion by 2030. There’s no revenue, and it’s not useful to people. Saying there’s some speculated value but not showing that there’s real services or a real product makes this a speculative investment vehicle, not science or technology.

Small research projects and niche production use cases aren’t 100b. You aren’t disproving it’s hypetrain with such small real examples.

Right, and what percentage of their expenditures is software tooling?

Who’s paying for this shit? Anybody? Who’s selling it without a loss? Anybody?

Is the market cap on speculative chemical analysis that many billions?

What’s the billable market cap on which services exactly?

How will there be enough revenue to justify a 60 billion evaluation?

Heh there might be some correlation along the lines of

Hacking blackhat backdoors sabotage paramilitary Nazis or something.

I have a mix of friends and the most spicy ones are also the smartest and most talented. Stereotypes are true sometimes.

quieter, and uses way less power.

VERY IMPORTANT PAY ATTENTION TO THIS SENTENCE OP