• 2 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 13th, 2023

help-circle



  • “Freedom of speech” is about the governments ability to regulate your speech. Other people have the free speech to tell you to shut the fuck up, or call you out for using slurs, as the disability rights activists are doing.

    No one is wanting the Stazi to show up if you say something shitty, but “r-tarded” is a word with a nasty history behind it. There are so many better ways to insult people than to compare someone or something to developmentally delayed people.

    It’s also extremely concerning when someone who is pretty explicitly pro eugenics is using a word that dehumanizes disabled people, while we just appointed a health guy who wants to make farm camps for people with ASD or ADHD.







  • Who has defined fascism as such? How do the practices of Stalinism root in Italian authoritarianism?

    Defining fascism as any form of authoritarianism broadens the term so much as to render it useless.

    It’s useful to be able to talk about the ways in which the ideologies which governed Franco’s Spain and Mussolini’s Italy are more similar to each other than say, something like the DPRK under Juche. If we want to refer to something as authoritarian, we already have the word authoritarian.


  • andros_rex@lemmy.worldtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldThe capitalist press
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What on earth makes me a Tankie? I’m not a Stalinist. I’m pretty anti-Stalin even - I think the doctors probably did let him die and that was a great thing. I just think words mean things.

    Let’s go with Eco, because it’s been fifteen years since I read Griffin. And I’ll pull the wiki summaries for quickness.

    “The cult of tradition”, characterized by cultural syncretism, even at the risk of internal contradiction. When all truth has already been revealed by tradition, no new learning can occur, only further interpretation and refinement.

    Not at all characteristic of the Stalin regime. Rejection of tradition - rejection of Eastern Orthodox religion, traditional serf structure.

    “The rejection of modernism”, which views the rationalistic development of Western culture since the Enlightenment as a descent into depravity. Eco distinguishes this from a rejection of superficial technological advancement, as many fascist regimes cite their industrial potency as proof of the vitality of their system.

    Also not accurate - Marxist-Stalinist thought saw time and modernism as progress.

    “The cult of action for action’s sake”, which dictates that action is of value in itself and should be taken without intellectual reflection. This, says Eco, is connected with anti-intellectualism and irrationalism, and often manifests in attacks on modern culture and science.

    Also just doesn’t quite fit. Action does have purpose, and isn’t motivated by the Freudian death drive in quite the same way.

    “Disagreement is treason” – fascism devalues intellectual discourse and critical reasoning as barriers to action, as well as out of fear that such analysis will expose the contradictions embodied in a syncretistic faith.

    This one is certainly true, the gulags undoubtedly qualify.

    “Fear of difference”, which fascism seeks to exploit and exacerbate, often in the form of racism or an appeal against foreigners and immigrants.

    Decidedly untrue. Stalin really loved showcasing different ethnic minority traditions. He was certainly antisemitic, but I’ve read too many accounts about Georgian dancing troops and linguistic revival to see this as accurate. Edit: I will be fair and bring up ethnic deportations and genocide which happened. But it’s not quite fascistic ethnic cleansing. There’s a difference in the way it’s presented to the public, in its motivations. It’s less the heroic struggle against Strangers, but more connected to historical conflicts. Evil and wrong, but not a fascistic “project.”

    “Appeal to a frustrated middle class”, fearing economic pressure from the demands and aspirations of lower social groups.

    No, the Bolsheviks explicitly appealed to a lower class.

    “Obsession with a plot” and the hyping-up of an enemy threat. This often combines an appeal to xenophobia with a fear of disloyalty and sabotage from marginalized groups living within the society. Eco also cites Pat Robertson’s book The New World Order as a prominent example of a plot obsession.

    This one counts, at least in the later years.

    Fascist societies rhetorically cast their enemies as “at the same time too strong and too weak”. On the one hand, fascists play up the power of certain disfavored elites to encourage in their followers a sense of grievance and humiliation. On the other hand, fascist leaders point to the decadence of those elites as proof of their ultimate feebleness in the face of an overwhelming popular will.

    No, propaganda tended to portray the battle against capitalism as being easy to win with solidarity.

    “Pacifism is trafficking with the enemy” because “life is permanent warfare” – there must always be an enemy to fight. Both fascist Germany under Hitler and Italy under Mussolini worked first to organize and clean up their respective countries and then build the war machines that they later intended to and did use, despite Germany being under restrictions of the Versailles treaty to not build a military force. This principle leads to a fundamental contradiction within fascism: the incompatibility of ultimate triumph with perpetual war.

    You don’t need perpetual war with the kulaks.

    “Contempt for the weak”, which is uncomfortably married to a chauvinistic popular elitism, in which every member of society is superior to outsiders by virtue of belonging to the in-group. Eco sees in these attitudes the root of a deep tension in the fundamentally hierarchical structure of fascist polities, as they encourage leaders to despise their underlings, up to the ultimate leader, who holds the whole country in contempt for having allowed him to overtake it by force

    Entirely incongruous with Soviet propaganda.

    “Everybody is educated to become a hero”, which leads to the embrace of a cult of death. As Eco observes, “[t]he Ur-Fascist hero is impatient to die. In his impatience, he more frequently sends other people to death.”

    No, they wanted engineers to build factories. Stakhanov is not consistent with the imagery of a fascist hero.

    “Machismo”, which sublimates the difficult work of permanent war and heroism into the sexual sphere. Fascists thus hold “both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality”.

    Soviet state under Stalin was one of the first to decriminalize homosexuality. Iirc Stalin did a take backsie later. More women were doctors than men. (We seldom talk about women in the movement - lots of pushes for temperance, it was the woman who wanted bread for their children along with the men of the Potemkin right?)

    “Selective populism” – the people, conceived monolithically, have a common will, distinct from and superior to the viewpoint of any individual. As no mass of people can ever be truly unanimous, the leader holds himself out as the interpreter of the popular will (though truly he alone dictates it). Fascists use this concept to delegitimize democratic institutions they accuse of “no longer represent[ing] the voice of the people”.

    Also goes against the whole idea of “we want democratic control over our factories.”

    “Newspeak” – fascism employs and promotes an impoverished vocabulary in order to limit critical reasoning.

    I’d concede this element as present.

    Again, I am not pro Stalin. I am not a tankie.

    Stalin was an authoritarian leader (and terrible! bad! not good!), but his ideology lacked the characteristics that make an ideology fascist.





  • As a trans person that has been begging anyone to intervene in my state for the past 4 years - being told over and over again that the shit that was happening was not happening… yeah.

    Kinda like how Nex Benedict murdered and no one cared. A trans woman in Grove disappeared a few years ago and her body just turned up - cops probably did it but no one will ever look into it.

    It’s been happening here ALREADY. I’ve been SCREAMING about it for years and no one’s listened. Now the fascists are at everyone’s door.

    Cops in Oklahoma routinely slaughter people. The feds have been trying to shut down OKC County jail for years because people die. They’ll often kick them out right before they are about to die so it doesn’t draw attention. Multiple deaths in Cleveland County jail too. Ten deaths in three years - just the ones they can’t cover up ofc.

    Wanna see an OKC cop slam a geriatric man into the ground? I can’t watch the video - but our AG Drummond didn’t think it was worth pursuing charges. I’ve always felt safe - one year walking to Pride overhearing them complain about needing to protect “the gays, the Mexicans and the Asians.”

    (If you really really want to go off the deep end - look up what happened to Terrence Yeakey - and think about how many shitbag OKC cops would have been upset about Waco. Flowers of the Killer Moon is a good indicator of Oklahoma’s commitment to investigations and justice…)

    Idabel cops wish they could still lynch people.

    Cops in Tulsa drug and rape kids.

    Edit: re NEX because HOLY FUCKING SHIT WHY HAS NO ONE DONE ANYTHING

    Hey doc - what’s the LD50 on Prozac and Benadryl? You can take a bottle of Benadryl - certainly a very bad time, but not particularly deadly. I know drugs have interactions, but that’s a pretty mild one. If it was the Prozac, wouldn’t the COD be serotonin syndrome…? Combined toxicity… hmmm…There wasn’t a chief coroner at the time either - Stitt was doing the Trump thing by just leaving a bunch of government offices unfilled while waiting for friends special enough to give the money and power to, and also was trying to pretend that COVID wasn’t happening.

    First reports said they died of head injury in hospital. I hop onto /pol/ as I’m want to do, they start speculating on suicide. Pretty sure Alex Jones said it’s suicide? Lots of eyes on the state, National media attention. Owasso might have already even been under investigation for fucky shit with sped students (which, tbh every school in Oklahoma should be). Lots of talk about terrible Ryan Walters policies (he appointed LibsOfTikTok to like a content review position - she got death threats called into Union High I think - near Tulsa - because she harassed some librarian there).

    [No one seems to acknowledge that trans teachers exist/are affected by these things lol - another of those things where I’ve called and been ignored by everyone from Lambda Legal to Tim Walz - like sorry, I shouldn’t be pissing next to your 14 year old daughter. Like yeah we had the staffs, but I also can’t make it there and back in 5 minutes without all of my bathroom scales being disappearing to be reused for far more economically productive uses. Fucking sucks, because I had year 3 of 4 done of the TEACH grant and was hoping for public service. Alons-y with the dreams of elsewhere.]

    We wait for the report. (Istg people were pointing out the lack of coroner at the time.)

    Report comes out. Ope, it was suicide. Sad sad sad. Another statistic. Another dead trans kid. Maybe it is a mental illness after all and they just need treatment. Lots of “her” and even lots of kinder but maybe misguided “him.” A complete amnesia that Nex was indigenous, tying this further into the curse that underlies all Oklahoman soil.

    The Owasso investigation concluded with some really damning results. Those are worth digging up at least. I can tell you it’s bad everywhere. I’ve BEEN TELLING PEOPLE (FEDS, CONGRESS PEOPLE, DEMS, ADVOCACY ORGS) THESE THINGS FOR SO FUCKING LONG IM SICK OF IT!