Now you’re […]talking about tariffs.
Not at all.
You don’t need to have diversity between horseshit and non-horseshit.
That is only true in a very general way.
In this specific case it does not help you with critisizing the guardian, because then you would first require them to know (and to give a damn about) your personal estimation of what is “horseshit and non-horseshit” ;-)
You are right at the beginning, but wrong in several aspects towards the end of your comment.
the idea that Trump is competently executing on plans that can be laid out coherently is also laughable.
For example, think about the sheer amount of executive orders he has put out in his first few days of his second term. This must have been planned and prepared. It was not just some random sh*t. You may be underestimating him a lot if you only think of “insane” etc. It was for a purpose.
Why are they putting this in the newspaper? This is not the first totally insane pro-Trump story I have seen in The Guardian.
The world is much more than “pro or against trump”. They want diversity and they are doing well.
Sagt die Bildzeitung das auch?
Gibt es eigentlich irgendeine Stelle, wo man nachfragen kann
Das wäre dann die Presse. Die hat früher bei den Behörden weiter nachgefragt und auch Antworten bekommen.
Heute gibt es leider kaum noch Presse, die sowas macht.
But maybe Europe simply does not want anymore.
Maybe this monetary “initiative” has been created exactly for this not wanting American weapons anymore.
etwa 90 Prozent der Straßen
mindestens 50 Prozent der befahrbaren Straßenkilometer
Womit hat man hier die Äpfel verglichen?
but it is the U.S. that is heading back to the 1930s,
Just think one step further.
One little step.
US goes back to fascism. A little later Germany goes back to fascism.
Germany has a strong tradition in following the US with every shitty fashion …
Trump has long railed against free trade, which Musk expressed support for
Maybe that’s the topic that has separated these two?
einfach nicht mehr wählen lässt
Ja, das hat er vor der Wahl angekündigt.
Rückkehr zu alter Größe, zum Beispiel in der Stahlindustrie
Bloß wer soll dann da arbeiten?
All die aus der Verwaltung, aus der Forschung und Bildung und sonstwo kürzlich Rausgeworfenen? Am besten für knapp unter Mindestlohn hart ranklotzen?
Noch vor ein paar Järchen hatte er da bestimmt bis 17 stehen… ;-)
But, does he know? ;-)
I remember, in 2025, when the former Whitehouse got renamed into the now Honourable Foulhouse.
/s
Now you are trying to distract with so many other topics that do not belong here.
EOD for me.