data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef118/ef118db8538316d13414b77917e324f00e093d44" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2f93/f2f939022ffae29e4decb326a98f4493d0a2e13e" alt=""
As a party, democrats have voted against all of Trumps cabinet picks.
Blaming “Senate Democrats” for the votes of outliers like Fetterman who vote against party lines is disingenuous.
As a party, democrats have voted against all of Trumps cabinet picks.
Blaming “Senate Democrats” for the votes of outliers like Fetterman who vote against party lines is disingenuous.
The article is about Trump ignoring the law. How do they change that by doing the things you listed?
The dems criticizing republicans aren’t their voter base. The republican voter base doesn’t criticize republicans.
Why does that need to be explained to you?
There was so much criticism of anti-fascists that actual authoritarian fascists won the election.
Criticism isn’t just criticism. It is used by bots and propaganda to discourage voting for anti-fascists.
The complaint is that there is a power grab that democrats aren’t stopping because they can’t. They don’t have enough votes.
If that power grab happens tomorrow instead of today then the complaint happens tomorrow instead of today.
This is common sense. I’m not sure why it needs to be explained to you.
We’re tired of your bad faith arguments.
You… you don’t know the difference between electing cabinet members and taking meds?
Your bad faith lacks nuance
This is the same excuse I’ve heard every time I point out that dems don’t have enough votes to do something.
When I ask when dems had a majority they point to Manchin or Sinema or Lieberman as their example of a dem majority proving they are arguing in bad faith and/or don’t understand what a supermajority is.
Meanwhile republicans don’t even criticize their own for committing crimes so they continue to win elections.
But I want to criticize democrats until republicans win elections and then criticize democrats for not doing the things I prevented them from doing…
No, they just can’t do anything because voters didn’t elect enough dems to give them a majority.
Delaying isn’t stopping anything. You’d be making the same comments just a little later.
What are senate dems supposed to do without a majority? The voters decided to prevent them from being able to do anything.
Bad actors try to hide that they are bad actors.
Those comments don’t undo all the work you’ve done for the GOP.
They are arguing in bad faith to help the fascists. They are in every thread that they can use to promote their anti democrat talking points.
Charging someone with a crime without an investigation IS illegal.
It is not legal to lock up political opponents without an investigation. Also, it normalizes Trumps corrupt behavior.
They did the only option other than doing nothing. As the saying goes: “you can do everything right and still fail”.
It’s pretty hypocritical to claim you don’t want the GOP breaking laws and performing coups but it’s ok if democrats do it.
You’re the one saying ‘just lock him up’ like it’s a normal case.
An investigation is required first. The insurrection involved thousands of people all of which had their own cases, witnesses and evidence, all had to be investigated before going after one of the most powerful people in the country, Trump, owner of judges.
It was not possible to just lock up Trump and if that was attempted there would be another January 6 with people storming whatever building Trump was held in.
But I think you know that and the intent of your comments is to blame democrats for Trumps actions.
Biden and Merrick did everything they could to charge Trump. Trump blocked the trial using his own corrupt judge.
This is the same talking point used in lemmy.ml and hexbear to try to blame democrats for Trumps actions.
They aren’t warning us. Trying reading more than the headline.