• 1 Post
  • 26 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle
  • On the other hand, what cost is it to Capcom to let players “redo” whenever they want? Some people just like trying new things.

    This is just a cash grab aimed at people who have alternative ways they want to play, with no real benefit to anyone but Capcom. I don’t care what people look like, as long as they don’t throw a hunt for the lols. And if it makes someone else happy to have a weird troll with an underbite one week and a giant Smurf the next, who am I to say that’s the wrong way to play?

    Just seems like Capcom further forcing people to fit within their box. First it was the anti-mod rootkit, now it’s limited in-game customizations.






  • First of all, let me say that I think it’s great how you’re dissecting all of this.

    It has gotten to the point where anything that you say will get you labeled as woke or a liberal.

    You might enjoy this video: https://youtu.be/v2QGME8KHzY

    He talks a lot about that idea in a very thoughtful way.

    Because it doesn’t hold a unified definition across the aisles.

    Besides this, political labels as a whole are mostly bullshit because people use them to describe themselves as being part of a group.

    This is, unfortunately, not an accident. First it was “the Commies,” then “the Gays,” then “the occult,” then the Liberals, then the “trans people,” then the “groomers,” and then, and then… The people in charge right now know exactly what they did and what they’re doing: shortcutting people’s ability to reason.

    This is common in religious cults and other abuse structures. It’s also no accident that fundamentalist religion is a major component of a lot of MAGA, since it already primes people not to question anything their leaders say.

    Until facts once again matter more than what our favorite political/billionaire celebrities say, they’ll continue to weaponize our worst impulses against us. Recognizing that you deserve to think for yourself is the first step in resisting.


    • Labels allow expedient understanding of a philosophy, concept, belief system, etc. They’re not pointless.
      • If you want to agree upon a definition of a label, you have to start by asking people what they mean and then go back and forth until you agree what “Label N” means. Otherwise, you’re just talking past each other.
    • Seems fine to me. I call them fascists, because they seem to believe in extreme government control of the population, jingoism and territorial expansion, religious indoctrination, cult worship of the leader, suppression of speech, and “othering” minorities in pursuit of power.
    • See my above point about religious indoctrination and cult worship. The in-group lingo signals to the group that you’re supposed to get mad about the thing without question; questioning might get you cast out from the group.
    • Not true. There’s lots of podcasters, for example, who check their facts and aren’t merely propaganda (Knowledge Fight is a great example). At best, you can say “many.”
    • How you decide to define the word “Christian” is subjective. Lots of the MAGA types would also consider themselves “followers of Christ.”
      • If Christians don’t want to be saddled with the ugly behavior of some of their adherents, they need to come together and agree upon a new label, either for themselves or for the ones they are rejecting.





  • Case in point: I was required to add a phone number to an account before they would let me use an Authenticator App. If you’re securing your account, the standard should be that an Auth App is agnostic of other user data. It doesn’t need your phone number, it doesn’t need your user ID, it just needs the secret key.

    And I was thinking all along, “What if I didn’t have a phone number? Are people who can’t be reached by phone just not allowed to use TOTP?”

    It’s needlessly discriminatory.