That’s a message I can stand with.

Sorry for projecting that on you.

The green crispy and sour ones are delicious.

It would even deserve to be some kind of royal rumble format!

I agree that “either” is more specific. And I don’t mind being reminded of it.

Otoh “any” is defined as ∃ x and every definition I found explicitely specified that cardinality is irrelevant. Either then is a subset of any, not a separate category.

So imho this isn’t a mistake and you’re way more unconditional than you should.

PS: as long that everyone remains sufficiently mutually understandable we should adopt a descriptivist attitude towards languages instead of a prescriptivist one.

PPS: Don’t get me started on language as a class marker. This is a threat. c:

• Not Oscar Wild

How would you categorize masochism as not sex? :o

3. Doctors because I eat apples.

It should’ve been some kind of extreme badass death match deluxe: nobody gets out of the cage while any one of them is still breathing.