Cat Sounds

Delivering Orders from our Greatest Enemy (putin)

Take a look at Gen Z dumbasses

And I’m saying this as a Gen Z

You can make a black screen to cover up the ads, you can’t skip it, but you can avoid seeing it.

Also, you can VPN to russia 😉

Thanks, putin

(for context: Russian IPs do not see ads because of sanctions)

Isn’t that technically not anarchism? It sounds more like direct democracy with limited government.

Okay, nazi

There probably wouldn’t be a “9/11” but there would be a bunch of angry white dudes just wanting to kill black people for some fucked up reason. dylan roof and the christchurch shooter aren’t gonna go away just because the state goes away

"Yay no more tyrannical state, now lets create a system to protect ourselves and…

ah shit, here we go again"

That’s the dilemma with legal proceedings.

If we want everyone to have a fair trial and allow appeals process, things take too long.

But if we allow things to be rushed, innocent people could get executed.

Starlink subscription about to cost $1000/month for 1Mbps Download / 0.1Mbps Upload, and datacap of 500GB

🙃

And also your background image automatically becomes a swastica

Chemicals are expensive and electricity bills are also high, a rope is the cheapest.

Japan doesn’t have the “no cruel and unusual punishment” clause in their constitution… so… ➰️💀

Stay away from far-left

You mean tankies? They aren’t “left” lol 🤣

Imagine if terrorists infiltated the government and weaponized it to kill Americans…

oh yea we’re seeing this right now 👀

BORTLES!

President is one person. Juries are 12 people (at minimum, for criminal trials). Verdicts have to be unanimous. If theres 11 not guolty and 1 guilty, the prosecution can repeat the trials indefinitely (until a judge dismisses it with prejudice)

I could envision a Trump appointed judge trying to use it nefariously in the near future.

Afiak, that is weaker than a non-guilty verdict from the jury. If a judge overruling a jury, that decision itself can be appealed and…

looks at composition of the supreme court

oh… shit… nvm… 👀

Like, I don’t think a jury can say, “we know there isn’t evidence that this person is guilty, but we want to put them away anyway.”

The can, but if the judge isn’t a total douche, they would just overrule the jury. Not to mention, it could be appealed. The guilty version of nullification is much weaker.

That goes both ways, people can convict without evidence

The guilty form of nullification is much weaker. A judge can overrule the jury. The case could be appealed.

In contrast, a non-guilty verdict is final, there is no way overturn it and there is no appeals.

Niko, it’s your cousin, Roman. LETS GO BOWLING!

I work in government

Understandable. If you work in like welfare departments, working harder to get people more benefits is a bigger “fuck you” to the government