data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef118/ef118db8538316d13414b77917e324f00e093d44" alt=""
Haha, ja der er noget kontekst den ikke har taget højde for, men ærligt talt så ville jeg også studse ved brugen af “RV” selvom jeg kendte konteksten.
Haha, ja der er noget kontekst den ikke har taget højde for, men ærligt talt så ville jeg også studse ved brugen af “RV” selvom jeg kendte konteksten.
Det er vel pga. dårlig tale-til-tekst efterfulgt af maskinoversættelse… Der er svært at lave en god oversættelse, hvis den genererer dårlig tekst ud fra tale.
Yeah the “great work guys, we doubled the EBITDA this year. Congratulations!..Here’s your 3% raise” kind of sucks
why are you trying to change what I wrote? Its clearly there. I said none of that.
Prusa being “for profit” isn’t the same as the term implies.
Well then I misinterpreted what you mention by that statement, what do you mean by it, if it wasn’t that they’re not a “real” for-profit company?
I suspect you have no knowledge of their platform or how they do business or where or the history of their founder.
No I have plenty experience and use printables a lot, it’s a great platform. I’ve been in-and-out of the 3d printer environment since early 2010’s, I perfectly well know their history and what they once were.
You said that they were not a “real” for-profit company, which is just plain wrong. They have even monetised their printables.com platform, if that’s not a for-profit move in the most classical sense I don’t know what is.
Prusa are 100% a for-profit organisation/company, they don’t attempt to sell printers or services at anywhere near cost, which is absolutely fine too. They are very much what the term implies, which is that they’re a business that has (and wants) to earn money. To say they’re not a for-profit company is absolutely delusional.
Yes having a semi-opensource approach is their gimmick to get goodwill from people to get them to buy their printers.
Until it gains stability resembling actual currency, it will remain a niche bartering item. All crypto still behave way too much like stocks to be used as payment methods in general society.
Solcelleparker er langt bedre for naturen og biodiversiteten end landbrug og det producerer strøm oven i det, så det må være win-win…jeg er vokset op på landet og har aldrig forstået hvorfor udsigt over marker er noget der appellerer til folk, det er røvsygt og landmænd fucking larmer på dem hele sommeren.
Ah ja det kan selvfølgelig også være, og så er det jo klart de er dårlige