Disregard. Wasn’t paying attention to the thread I was responding to.

Thanks, Obama!

With free cancer!

A large subset of introverts won’t use text based communications such as this; they lurk so whatever negative response here need a multiplier applied.

The 90-9-1 rule would indicate the factor is 9.

That you use being offended to be offensive it is a common emotional response. So I accept the explanation that you are of simple mind in this regard.

You’ve have choosen to take the intolerance of one small opinion of mine and expanded it to total intolerance of me as a fellow human.

You do you.

Agreed. This is the one government agency where the majority of them benefit from its existence.

All but the very youngest boomers are already eligible.

They fucked around for decades, fuck us for decades and it’s time they find out.

They won’t be voting if they starve and die before the next election.

We already allow simulated rape in tv and movies. AI simply allows a more graphical portrayal.

Correct. This quickly approaches thought crime.

What about an AI gen of a violent rape and murder. Shouldn’t that also be illegal.

But we have movies that have protected that sort of thing for years; graphically. Do those the become illegal after the fact?

And we also have movies of children being victimized so do these likewise become illegal?

We already have studies that show watching violence does not make one violent and while some refuse to accept that, it is well established science.

There is no reason to believe the same isn’t true for watching sexual assault. There are been many many movies that contain such scenes.

But ultimately the issue will become that there is no way to prevent it. The hardware to generate this stuff is already in our pockets. It may not be efficient but it’s possible and efficiency will increase.

The prompts to generate this stuff are easily shared and there is no way to stop that without monitoring all communication and even then I’m sure work around would occur.

Prohibition requires society sacrifice freedoms and we have to decide what weee willing to sacrifice here because as we’ve seen with or prohibitions, once we unleash the law on one, it can be impossible to undo.

Cool. And yet you keep responding and so what does that say about you? What compels you to continue this demonstration? Do you feel your superior virtue has not be made clear?

It feels like you need to silence me and your method involves intimidating me. What is your justification for this.

Why do draw the line at beliefs? This is all endless curious to me.

I am most curious why your curiosity has this hardline and what makes you feel so extremely justified, so certain. All this allowing you to draw a hard line here of all places.

I expect you won’t elaborate but I suspect it is all based on emotion and not logic.

I’m not sure if it was your another that indicated I should fear being body shamed myself and so how much of all this is based on your fear of being body shamed.

I know mine is partly based on not giving a shit if someone wants to make fun of me because I would never give another person that power over me.

The official reason they dropped it is because there were security concerns. The more likely reason was the massive outcry that occurs when Apple does these questionable things. Crickets when it’s Google.

The feature was re-added as a child safety feature called “Comminication Saftey” that is optional on a child accounts that will automatically block nudity sent to children.

These ad hominem attacks are quite ironic given the topic

Your assumptions for my reasons for responding is based on your personal biases. It indicates a lack of curiosity as to who I am as in individual.

I’m going to need a complete criminal background on both them before I can decide if I need to find some other excuse for why the cops did nothing wrong here.

The issue here is still you thinking I’m offended. I’m not. You continue to insist I am and insist you know my motivations.

You and I disagree I what a bad person is. I can accept that. Why can’t you?

I posted this knowing it would get called out. Literally just said that. It appears you’ve having trouble understanding what I am saying.

I think this makes you a bad person. If you disagree then by your own rules that makes you childish. Does this help you see the fallacy of your logic?

It’s really weird how much emotion is in all of these responses but it’s really silly when you then claim I am being emotional.

I’ve made no claims to my moral superiority but you and other have. That is a paradox.

We disagree on something. Calling me childish is a bully tactic.

I am true to myself and that offends people in weird silly ways. It results in them applying their imagined prejudices to me.

These are all logical fallacies and if there is one thing I’ve learned over the year is that those who deploy them are not worth arguing with and this is such an occurrence.

I knew it would lead here because the internet is predictable because people are predictable.

For example you will now ignore me or responses with an emotional response, dismisal of my position and list of logical facllicies you feel I am using because you aren’t interesting in a discussion.

You need me to be a bad person

Nope. I understand logical fallacies.

For example, you calling me a child is one.

Yep.

It’s funny how you’re acting superior but have no problem judging the world I must live in as being shitty.

The difference between you and I is that I don’t lie to myself. It’s a subtle difference but actually leads to living in a world that is less shitty.

Maybe one day you can join me but you’ll need to let go of that gate your keeping yourself behind.

This is fundamentally no different than making fun of someone for obvious plastic surgery. Choices were made.

This guy is clearly choosing to look like this.

Agreed.

Many is oversell.

Some is likely but not quite clear. If suspect many more faces will need to be eaten before there is any real shift.

The reports I’ve seen have all indicated those with eaten faces haven’t changed their minds.