OP’s pic. Saved a click

You’d think so, but no. You cannot be punished as a juror for voting your conscience. So long as you don’t say “I intentionally lied during voir dire to sabotage due process” they cannot even ask you why you voted the way you did unless you volunteer for questions afterwards.

so it’s tricky to nullify without purgery except for very very special cases.

Assuming you meant perjury, it is not tricky in the slightest. You vote your conscience and don’t say something stupid like “I lied during voire dire, nyah ah ahhh!”.

Because it is.

The news I post is as good as can be expected. AP, Reuters, Kyiv Independent are reputable news agencies. You need to look more at the source than the publisher. “Government officials says…” articles are factually ‘true’. The official said that. Lies? Corroborating evidence? Critical thinking is your job as much as it is the reporter’s.

My understanding is that the US maintains control over the fund. As such, IMO, it is likely they plan to spend the money on US contractors helping to rebuild UA. At first glance this may seem mutually beneficial, but it still means the funds are getting pulled away from UA instead of being spent towards UA contractors doing the rebuilding.

I’m just guessing though. I’m keeping an eye out for any analysis articles published by a reputable news agency for clarity.