• FiskFisk33@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The pricing for every single one of the new aeropress products are absolutely crazy. I would have loved an XL if it wasn’t the price of three original aeropresses.

    • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah they have had MBA SKU madness takeover. They have far too much to sell these days for the simplicity of their original idea.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Sold at Williams Sonoma says it all. That’s way overpriced. Also the amount of times I have dropped a piece of my aeropress, this would last a month, tops.

  • WhyAUsername_1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I am happy with my cheap knockoff aeropress that I throw in my luggage bag when I travel . If I loose it, I buy a new inexpensive aeropress.

    Why the hell would I want a glass aeropress?

    • Gxost@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s for those who use AeroPress at home and are concerned about microplastics.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      To use at home, instead of a much cheaper French press, or a similarly priced cheap espresso machine that makes coffee 100x better. Obviously /s

      • I see your sarcasm, but all three of these things make very different types of coffee. Even if you can’t tell the difference between Aeropress and French press coffee (which probably not a large percent of people can), you can certainly tell the difference between espresso and immersion, right?

        As for this thing: plastics do degrade over time, and an insulated glass body is a nice upgrade. The metal press won’t contribute anything to the coffee quality, but it looks better, and probably feels nicer.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Plastics may degrade, but (as others have mentioned) if a plastic one lasts 10+ years, so far, where’s the value in a glass one?

          Plus you could buy 4 plastic ones for the cost of 1 glass that could far more easily break.

          I’m all for glass in a LOT of stuff. I even kind of like it here (for the reasons you’ve stated), I just can’t get behind the cost.

          I tend to go for better/best quality in most things, I hate buying stuff twice. But there’s value in being able to replace a less robust device for 1/4 the cost of the “higher quality” version.

          • drphungky@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Plastics may degrade, but (as others have mentioned) if a plastic one lasts 10+ years

            Micro plastics can be released as soon as a water bottle is first filled. This isn’t the structural integrity of the plastic failing, it’s your endocrine system and who knows what else being affected by tiny pieces of plastic that start shedding immediately.

            Look, I’m not saying this isn’t a cash grab because the serial inventor who made the aero press sold a controlling stake in his company and the new firm is squeezing as much money out as they can before the patent expires, BUT some of us do care about micro plastics. Not that I give my daughter coffee, but now that I have a toddler we’ve eliminated as much food related plastic as we can.

            Stuff is genuinely damaging and yet we keep using it because it’s convenient. And people wonder why the Romans used lead containers.