• gwilikers@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    This video genuinely came off as satire to me. Like ‘If you spend, $20 more you can reduce the sum total suffering of this animal (before we kill it) while still giving money to us (the very corporations that engage in those practices). That is, if any of these labels even mean anything (which they don’t).’

    Like, the premise of, ‘I don’t like it when animals suffer so how can we make them suffer less (while still suffering cuz I like to eat meat)’ is such an morally bankrupt starting point for an argument.

    I appreciate that they highlighted the insane cruelty of factory farms on a popular channel but ffs if your going to mention the importance of individual purchasing power in determining market trends and not say ‘You could also, y’know, just not fucking eat animal products,’ then I feel like the arguments you’re making are a bit spineless.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    The mussels suggestion is wild to me. I get it, they try to provide a suggestion that’s still technically meat, but mussels are also so much more exotic and presumably expensive than e.g. beans. You can eat beans without converting to full-time veganism.

  • CazzoBuco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Felt like they were catering to the most cognitive dissonant people out there

    “Imagine if it was a dog!” Bruh, it’s already pretty fucking awful for a pig, I don’t need to imagine puppy mills too

    “You love animals, you love meat, both are true” helllll naahhhhh

      • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Death is still painful and premature death years before it would have occurred is still very bad for animals

          • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Nobody said they’re more evil? The point is they’re still bad and the solution isn’t “pay a little for family farmed” (both for animal welfare and environmental reason)

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              Family farms are in the best position to pivot and react to new market demands, it’s where change will have to start.

              • gwilikers@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                It’s a completely unsustainable model. Family farms are a perverse pastoral fetishization of animal cruelty that is incompatable with the fact of continuous population growth.

                • jet@hackertalks.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  A farm can produce plants as well as animals - a fully plant based farm can also not be family owned and operated? I agree the world is concentrating into the hands of very few corporations, but I don’t welcome it.