• federal reverse@feddit.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I don’t think that’s set in stone. The new gonservätïve commission is rather focused on not being too firm or too prescriptive, on the mistaken theory that that gives better results than doing proper research in finding the best approaches before handing out money.

      The choices are probably still the usual:

      • batteries and “clean” hydrogen for the short range
      • SAF (sustainable aviation fuel), i.e. kerosene analogs that are either plant-/animal-/waste-based or are e-fuels created from captured carbon and “clean” hydrogen
    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Good question. I did the math once. Assuming the best possible parameters, for getting all the aviation fuel out of renewable resources, we would have to turn every piece of agricultural land - gardens, fields, orchards, forests, winyards, meadows - in our country into perpetual rapeseed fields. And would still have to import stuff.