• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Well, you are being quite belittling and passive agressive, I don’t think my brand comes into it.

    In any case, what you describe as cool open source tools are literally just a paragraph and some screenshot for the most part and only really benefit their legal team. This isn’t anything praise worthy.

    It seems we both have been factually wrong, except I’m the only one that has admitted to it and clarified my points to move the conversation. I also believe your overall message is wrong but on a deeper level.

    Try pondering about what’s being talked about. You also don’t need to slip in a paragraph of your angst every comment.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No, there are actual pieces of software they’ve released alongside the patents. It’s a thing. Look it up.

      You can’t really bothsides this, that’s not how this works.

      I guess on one thing you were right, which is that we can choose to not interact.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I only know of fonttik and iris but neither of those are in the patent pledge. Those were actually open sourced, so Im guessing there isnt much need for it, but everything since has gone through lawyers from what I know.

        I’ll admit though, I haven’t read through all their patents. I’ll be happy to be proved wrong.