• inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      In 250 years of history, not counting the colonial times that started beforehand which would date back to 1619 and make conservatives cry…. Yeah. Those are glimmers of good in centuries of bad.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        What’s your unit of measurement there? I’m guessing whatever it is is “per year”?

        • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          What’s your point? America has a had a few good years out of 250, or 400 if we’re counting the colonial times. The fact that you’re arguing with me about Americas history of being mostly shitty is serious fucking cope.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            What’s “cope”? Actually, what are we arguing about? I don’t disagree that those things are true.

            I do disagree that countries can be “good” or “bad” without any other qualifiers such as “at healing the sick” or something. I also disagree that something (or someone) can be only all-good or all-bad, which is the only phrasing you’re using even though you probably also don’t think someone can be all-good or all-bad.

            “If we’re counting colonial times” is also interesting - what, like Jamestown counts as America? or the original 13 colonies? That seems a little bogus as they didn’t even have cybertrucks or toxic waste then.