• leisesprecher@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Thing is, it doesn’t replace workers. And it won’t for the foreseeable future. Even Microsoft itself had to admit that their studies show AI assisted coding to be bad and making developers worse.

    There is hardly any market where these systems can reasonably compete with exploited humans. It’s just that the tech bros have nothing left to invest in. The same idiots that pushed crypto, NFTs and the Metaverse are now pushing for AI. There is hardly any innovation anymore, so the only ways to make line go up are rent seeking and investing in bubbles in the desperate attempt, that something might stick.

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Translation on a level an AI could do is already pretty cheap, nobody’s gonna throw a nuanced legal document at an AI and rely on it.

        Junior devs are much smarter than any current AI, because they know what they want to achieve and why. There’s a reason why all the demos are toy examples. Actual code is messy and full of quirks because of weird requirements.

        • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Junior devs are much smarter than any current AI, because they know what they want to achieve and why

          Oh sweet summer child

          • leisesprecher@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            See, acting like a condescending asshole without any substance is a task that AI may never take from us.

                  • leisesprecher@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    No, I fully understand your point, I just think it’s shit, and since your first reaction to being challenged is a shitty attempt at belittling, I have to assume you’re about as valuable as your point.

                    Why would I trust the judgement of someone who can’t even fathom the concept of “someone else might have a valid point”?