cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoOpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair usearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square490fedilinkarrow-up11.23Karrow-down114cross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.worldtechnik@feddit.orgtecnologia@lemmy.eco.brartificialintelligence@lemmy.sdf.org
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1external-linkOpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair usearstechnica.comcyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square490fedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.worldtechnik@feddit.orgtecnologia@lemmy.eco.brartificialintelligence@lemmy.sdf.org
minus-squareeestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoI fail to see the significance of not being dominant in bullshit generation, which is OpenAIs specialty. Non-LLM machine learning is more interesting, but “write me a poem about how you’re my loving ai waifu” is just not a strategic resource.
minus-squareGreyfoxsolid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoI didn’t think you’ve thought it through to it’s logical conclusion, and your example shows a demeaning attitude towards what AI can currently be used for. When you reduce it to what you view as ridiculous uses, you become lacking in the facts.
I fail to see the significance of not being dominant in bullshit generation, which is OpenAIs specialty.
Non-LLM machine learning is more interesting, but “write me a poem about how you’re my loving ai waifu” is just not a strategic resource.
I didn’t think you’ve thought it through to it’s logical conclusion, and your example shows a demeaning attitude towards what AI can currently be used for. When you reduce it to what you view as ridiculous uses, you become lacking in the facts.