Yes, this is likely to fail, but one of the powers the minority has in a legislature is to introduce bills like this to remind people what the majority could have been doing

With republicans narrow majorities, it only takes a handful of defections to get things through. Doing stuff like this helps make more republicans squeamish and can help get those flips

  • anon@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is what has to be done. You introduce a bill directly affecting veterans and make Trump admit he doesn’t give a damn about them.

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is meant for the congressman’s own benefit since he heavily leaned on his veteran credentials when he campaigned. But whether it’s going to make a difference or not, I applaud the effort from a freshman nonetheless. Making a difference with a thousand cuts is still making a difference.

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    How about reinstating all of the employees, since they were fired illegally?

    Maybe this has a 1% chance of passing instead of a 0% chance for “all,” but democrats should stop building policy around republicans’ expectations. This watered-down crap does nothing in the end.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Since it’s unlikely to pass, the real value is in getting Republicans’ names attached to a “no” vote. Then Democrats can campaign to red areas and show how anti-veteran the Republicans have been this session, which plays a lot better in those areas than an “all” bill that doesn’t mention veterans.