Hey man, don’t get discouraged. AI isn’t hated on because it doesn’t have valid uses - assistive language-based problems are a great candidate for AI help, and coding is language!
What people are rightfully concerned about is AI being used to replace skilled work - especially artists - or use in establishing facts, not help teach newbies. Someone using AI to help word their resume or provide some help when stuck programming is not the issue - a game dev laying off artists and coders to let AI do the job worse but nearly free is.
This 80s metal band is making real music without synthesizers!
I just know people are going to flock to my novel that I manually typewritered each copy myself.
I feel like this will work out about as well as “GMO-free” labels on food.
I can dig it. For me it’s similar to seeing physical products described as “handcrafted” to denote quality versus something mass produced. A lot of indie devs pour enormous amounts of time and energy into animation, scripts, music, etc. that a derivative gen AI would just spit out in seconds.
Man, some real pathetic, deflated bullshit in this comment section.
This badge fucking rules. Let’s make it a huge problem for the first game that uses it dishonestly.
I wonder if LLM companies will use that stamp as a way to identify original ideas they can scrape.
And who is verifying it?
It says it right on the stamp. “This developer”. So themselves.
Users will end up verifying it. Activision just got caught using gen-ai in call of duty and had to come clean.
If developers are caught lying they will lose credibility.
