data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/956fc/956fcb6183970e3f9164f7913b3c62c63cbf2276" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2f93/f2f939022ffae29e4decb326a98f4493d0a2e13e" alt=""
A Tweet from Elon Musk: Associated Propaganda
Because he doesn’t want anyone to question him
A Tweet from Elon Musk: Associated Propaganda
Because he doesn’t want anyone to question him
deleted by creator
The LGPL does its job, it’s not as copyleft as GPL or AGPL, but having those licenses doesn’t guarantee that companies will use it, like Gab, which used a fork of Mastodont, Truth Social, or Pawoo. If you want a more restrictive license, the OSI basically won’t accept it as open source because it doesn’t meet their guidelines.
Also, there are no other browsers due to the standards set by W3C and therefore browsers have to have corporate support.
An AGPL license is a verdict that the browser will not be successful.
In addition, Ladybird is under the guardianship of a non-profit organization.
NetSurf updates are very slow
Which do you prefer more, Willow, Majorana 1 or Ocelot?
The altgov network could be using TOR to pass information and then publish it on Bluesky.
It means that Republican voters are going to shrink
Let’s hope that Ladybird be better than Mozilla Firefox.
I would be curious if Ladybird is successful, maybe Microsoft, Apple or Brave will use it after leaving Chrome and WebKit.