• warmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    TLDW: DLSS Transformer is better, FS4 is better than the rest in terms of quality, but performance (fps) is worse?

    Did I get it right? What’s excellent about this ? I mean it’s very good given the price, but… excellent?

    • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      FSR4 is available for GPUs that can’t do DLSS. GPUs that can do DLSS transformer model are very expensive. Console gamers will appreciate that next gen won’t look like poop.

    • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      If you play games with FSR3 (which is commonly used on consoles) then you know what’s being shown on those screens even when resized into a post stamp. FSR3 dithers and smudges this kind of detail terribly and it’s much worse when seen in motion. There are some examples that capture it better even in a still frame due to consistent nature of motion:

      (Yes, this really affects the shape of a waterfall lol)

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        When I played horizon forbidden west I thought the ocean was unreasonably pixellated and ugly, then I turned off fsr and it was actually pretty nice